Fuzzy Dunlop
North Banker
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2022
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
Londonlisa2001 said:exiledclaseboy said:I think football has made a poor decision to be honest. And out of kilter with most other sports which are going ahead with appropriate tributes, that's what football should have done.
It’s because most other sports can be more certain of decent behaviour.
Imagine Liverpool doing their whole booing bit.
As someone born in Liverpool, from a quick, unscientific survey of Liverpool fans, there's a difference between booing an anthem about God and the institution of the monarchy (and, I'd argue, the class system), and booing a minutes silence for a human being.
As others have said, there'll always be a minority of prats, but, perhaps naively, I think the vast majority of Liverpool fans (and of all clubs) would recognize that difference. If they did play the anthem, I'd think I'd ended up in North Korea and would have no issue with it being booed - one person is not the country. Armbands and a silence would be sufficient.
Ultimately this comes down to football authorities not having faith in working class fans to behave, and running in fear of the Telegraph or Mail. God forbid that the people are allowed - "respectfully" or not - to express how they feel about the monarchy. All this shows is how craven the Football Association is, and how little they care about players or fans, though I shouldn't be surprised at this.