We have to stop gambling with managers as we have been ever since Laudrup left. This just isn't working.
The problem is, however, there are just so many crap managers out there it's extremely difficult to find the 'good uns' -- they'll either be rarer than Bob Bradley's 'manager of the season' awards, or simply out of our reach. Additionally it's not a given that a manager who was successful at other clubs can bring the same success to Swansea.
Management, moreso in football, is a funny game in itself. Do we keep Sheehan in the hope he can improve himself and the squad, or sack him...?
I, personally, would prefer it if we could avoid having to pay huge compensation to managers we sack before having to start things all over again with a new manager. But I'd more prefer us not being in this position to begin with.
So, keeping Sheehan is dubious at best and sacking him also has inherent risks.
Which brings me to the possibility of 'making a manager': a third option which 'could' yield very good results, is expensive but keeps things the same but vastly different... Confused? Let me explain...
This novel option involves hiring a mentor; a very experienced retired manager or head coach with a long proven track record working with highly successful clubs. Their role will be to directly work alongside Sheehan and pass on their experience, including to the assistant manager and coaches as an ongoing, developmental role which, if successful, will turn Alan Sheehan into an efficient, adept manager for the Swans; able to better manage the squad because, frankly, he is clearly out of his depth at present.
There are zero guarantees with any of the above options.
Considering these options, there is only one viable route and zero solutions. None are ideal or necessarily the answer to our problems.
This is one of those posts that give the appearance of something worthwhile and substantial and yet offers absolutely nothing: much like most managers out there.