No.
The outcome of a gamble doesn’t change the gamble in the first place.
We’ve played two games fewer under him than he’d had as manager in total before we appointed him. Which was the only run of games we had to base our ‘data analysis’ on.
It remains a hugely risky appointment for a club that was in our position. We all hope the gamble pays off. It’s far too early to tell yet. But I like him and I’m pleased he’s managed to get some much needed energy into the team. It will take different players before he can do much else.
No more of a risk than when we appointed Garry Monk who had zero managerial/coaching experience when we were in the PL
Appointing any manager/coach us always a risk we appointed Martin who had had 2 seasons experience,Duff with 5 seasons experience how did those work out?
We fail to give the club managment any kudos in the selection process as it is kept being said "there is no football" knowledge....despite our CEO having spent the majority of his career in football clubs admittedly not focused on the playing side but his last role was as CEO too. What football knowledge did David Goldstone ,Malcolm Struel, Doug Sharpe,Huw Jenkins have?
According to the owners Christmas message the recruitment process was detailed....
It is early days but what I have seen so far makes me think we actually might have got it right this time.
Watching the video showing him arriving at the club...meeting the staff at Fairwood how he spoke with them ,how he seems to be in the dressing room and his interviews pre and post match filled me with some confidence .
He has spoken much about building a team and I believe that wasnt just about on the pitch,where he has made an impact in a short frenetic period of games and without his coaching team.
I feel far more confident in Matos than I did in the early days of Martin..( I was crucified on the boards for dissing him very early doors) or Duff and even Sheehans appointment. Still early days and it could go all wrong lets hope not.
I have no expectations of playoffs our games under Sheehan put paid to that....All I ask from Matos is the continuing improvement with us winning more and scoring more.
We are creating chances we had 2 golden ones at Coventry which we failed to convert they could have given us that win against a higher team that is talked about. We created a couple yesterday too resulting in a blicjed shot from Fulton and Ronald shooting when perhaps he could have passed inside.
We are looking a different side to the one we saw just before Sheehans dismissal in terms of workrate...yet Sheehan talked about us needing one yet couldnt get the same players to do what they are now plus we have mire attacking intent.