Ringwood Jack said:
Not sure why the continued comparison with Tammy is. Brewster is further down the road nearer Liverpool's first team squad that Tammy was with Chelsea. Are you suggesting a couple more seasons like Tammy Brewster needs in the Championship?
Yeah, why would I compare him with Tammy? After all, they were both 19-year old players at Top 4 PL clubs at the time we took them on loan, both shone for England's youth teams and they play in the same position. Not enough similarities there to use Tammy's experience as a comparison at all is there?
If Tammy had stayed at Chelsea that season, he would have been presumably third choice for the lone striker role behind Morata and Giroud. Brewster's situation is harder to determine, given Liverpool's more fluid system, but presumably he's behind Firmino, Mane, Salah, Minamino and Origi for a starting place, although he doesn't offer anything like the versatility of most of those players. Not sure 6th choice to fill one of 3 positions is any better than 3rd choice for 1 position myself. That is if he's considered a better choice by Klopp than Harry Wilson or Harvey Elliot.
I thought I'd made my point pretty clear, but will try again. I believe that a year playing for a team who just finished in the Top 6 of the Championship where he'll get plenty of chances to score and will be one of the first names on the team-sheet will be a better thing for his development than going to a struggling PL side who will not provide him with many goalscoring chances and who will probably reduce his minutes in favour of a veteran striker who they feel will be more valuable in fighting relegation than a youngster learning his trade.
That's my take, feel free to give an argument showing why you feel differently.