New Deal For Jay Fulton

[Wr1]

Cynically you could argue he’s started the play once his contract was due but there’s more to it than that. He’s obviously settled here and he’s had his bumper contract so if it’s a reduced this time around then it’s a no brainer. If he’s still a top earner then there are some questions around why he’s had 2 years and we’ve not looked to replace him in the summer

 

[Swanjaxs]

So what have the club got out of his last juicy contract? Half a dozen decent games, mostly as his contract is coming to an end . So that warrants a fresh 2 year contract does it ? I truly give up with this club.

Crack on then, go play bowls or something

 

[Neath_Jack]

I’d love for his contact to be leaked showing that he’s had a massive pay rise, shares issued to him, a guaranteed coaching role when he finishes and a big signing on bonus.

 

[magicdaps10]

Cynically you could argue he’s started the play once his contract was due but there’s more to it than that. He’s obviously settled here and he’s had his bumper contract so if it’s a reduced this time around then it’s a no brainer. If he’s still a top earner then there are some questions around why he’s had 2 years and we’ve not looked to replace him in the summer

It's strange that a player with over 10 years at the club and still only 31 is being discussed that receiving a new contract and hope his terms have been reduced really does give a clear indication to the situation.
Its great to have rose tinted glasses and a bit of sentiment, it's not really held us in stead over the years and I think if we want to go in the direction we are looking then tough choices need to be made.

1 year contract at reduced terms was top for me. Integral part of the unit i am sure, great on the training ground and changing rooms I am sure but a 2 year playing contract!?

 

[Cooperman]

It's strange that a player with over 10 years at the club and still only 31 is being discussed that receiving a new contract and hope his terms have been reduced really does give a clear indication to the situation.
Its great to have rose tinted glasses and a bit of sentiment, it's not really held us in stead over the years and I think if we want to go in the direction we are looking then tough choices need to be made.

1 year contract at reduced terms was top for me. Integral part of the unit i am sure, great on the training ground and changing rooms I am sure but a 2 year playing contract!?

It’s a two year contract where you have no visibility of the terms.

 

[magicdaps10]

It’s a two year contract where you have no visibility of the terms.

That's correct. I was just suggesting what I would be looking at given the full picture rather than basing something over recent months.
I am just putting my hopes that this new income coming in from sponsorship allows for 2 year contracts for players like Fulton and Fisher and/or Fulton continues his form over a longer period of time(length of his time here as a player).

As for Fisher, I would have been looking at bringing in a younger keeper who we see as a replacement for Vigs....more of a long term plan as such.

 

[Vetchonian]

It's strange that a player with over 10 years at the club and still only 31 is being discussed that receiving a new contract and hope his terms have been reduced really does give a clear indication to the situation.
Its great to have rose tinted glasses and a bit of sentiment, it's not really held us in stead over the years and I think if we want to go in the direction we are looking then tough choices need to be made.

1 year contract at reduced terms was top for me. Integral part of the unit i am sure, great on the training ground and changing rooms I am sure but a 2 year playing contract!?

According to another fan site it is on " much reduced terms".

 

[Neath_Jack]

It’s a two year contract where you have no visibility of the terms.

Yeah but he’s basing it on the full picture mun, not like the club who are only looking at the past few months performances. He knows how these things work see.

 

[Cooperman]

That's correct. I was just suggesting what I would be looking at given the full picture rather than basing something over recent months.
I am just putting my hopes that this new income coming in from sponsorship allows for 2 year contracts for players like Fulton and Fisher and/or Fulton continues his form over a longer period of time(length of his time here as a player).

As for Fisher, I would have been looking at bringing in a younger keeper who we see as a replacement for Vigs....more of a long term plan as such.

I will bet my next pay packet that we haven’t lavished money we don’t have on Fulton’s new contract.

The Vig succession plan will likely be our third choice keeper

 

[Cooperman]

Yeah but he’s basing it on the full picture mun, not like the club who are only looking at the past few months performances. He knows how these things work see.

Ah right, yes, the full picture.

 

[Smurph]

Yeah but he’s basing it on the full picture mun, not like the club who are only looking at the past few months performances. He knows how these things work see.

Temu Dimi

 

[magicdaps10]

I will bet my next pay packet that we haven’t lavished money we don’t have on Fulton’s new contract.

The Vig succession plan will likely be our third choice keeper

That is the thing, it has to be financially in the clubs best interest and the same for Fish IF he does eventually become the 3rd choice which I could see happening.
Finances and what is best for the club needs to be priority and hopefully not sentiment and what they are like around the club.

 

[magicdaps10]

According to the Indy it is on " much reduced terms".

That would make sense and very justified.

 

[Smurph]

That is the thing, it has to be financially in the clubs best interest and the same for Fish IF he does eventually become the 3rd choice which I could see happening.
Finances and what is best for the club needs to be priority and hopefully not sentiment and what they are like around the club.

Extending the contracts of these two players is more financially viable than bringing in their replacements.

Suggesting the club has kept them on out of sentiment is nonsense. They've been kept on based on merit.

 

[monmouth]

Excellent news