• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

Ricky Jones

It’s not a ruling, it’s a verdict from a jury who heard all the evidence and took less than half an hour to decide on that verdict. Lucy the Patriot didn’t have a trial because she pleaded guilty. She admitted to she did it. It was a fair cop guv. I done it and no mistake. If Lucy the Patriot had been confident of her innocence she could have pleaded not guilty and taken her chances with a jury like this fella did.
Well he’s admitted he said it. Just that he never meant it literally.
 
But that was my point about poorly represented Legally, if what the BBC article says is true, then all they had to do was say not guilty, and then went to trial say I never meant it literally.

On the basis of what the bbc article says, then if you want fair play, then surely all the online hate speech convictions and custody, must be deemed unsafe.

They have pleaded guilty to something, that in a similar case has been proven to be not guilty!
Nothing unsafe about it.

You pays your money and takes your chances. It was ever thus.
 
We’ve all seen he said it. That was never in doubt.
But none of us have sat through the evidence. The jury did and found him not guilty with little deliberation. Perhaps Drax the Destroyer was the foreman. If you have seen the first 'Guardians of the Galaxy' film I hope you get it.
 
But that was my point about poorly represented Legally, if what the BBC article says is true, then all they had to do was say not guilty, and then went to trial say I never meant it literally.

On the basis of what the bbc article says, then if you want fair play, then surely all the online hate speech convictions and custody, must be deemed unsafe.

They have pleaded guilty to something, that in a similar case has been proven to be not guilty!

Leave it pal all us normal people understand you.
 
We’ve all seen he said it. That was never in doubt.
Agreed. But no way in the world, should people be serving 3 or 4 years in prison for saying similar things. Like I say poorly represented. I’m just making a point on a legal matter here, I don’t care if anyone is left or right.
 
Awww poor Lucy, the right wing pin up girl. Never mind, I’m sure she won’t be so quick next time 🤣
 
But none of us have sat through the evidence. The jury did and found him not guilty with little deliberation. Perhaps Drax the Destroyer was the foreman. If you have seen the first 'Guardians of the Galaxy' film I hope you get it.
I’ve seen it. All the patriots that were sent down after they shamefully used the murder of little girls in Southport for their own rancid purposes should have pleaded not guilty, I’m sure juries of their peers would have acquitted them. But they didn’t so they need to suck it up.
 
Anyway, Lucy the patriot will be fine. She’ll be on Gogglebox or Celeb Big Brother in a year or so. Or loose women. She’s a far right bete noir now. They look after their own.
 
Seriously though is he a rampant righty because I’ve never heard of him before and I only saw it because a very good friend of mine retweeted the thread?
Not by instinct. But he’s a Tory so genetically stupid. He was a minister in various positions in the last government and now shadow Home Secretary I think. He’s also completely irrelevant.
 

Swansea City🦢 v Sheffield United 🔪

Online statistics

Members online
11
Guests online
314
Total visitors
325

Members online

Back
Top