Ricky Jones

[BLAZE]

Ye true enough I just couldn't believe the urgency it was given

Anyway, I'm off to the forum that shall not be spoken of so I can be with my brethren

Heil

 

[jack123]

But they pleaded guilty. They admitted they did it. It’s the very definition of a safe conviction.

What part of they were poorly represented legally, do you not understand FFS.

 

[exiledclaseboy]

What part of they were poorly represented legally, do you not understand FFS.

How do you know that? They may well have been. Or they may have just thought they were bang to rights.

 

[exiledclaseboy]

In a strange twist, I’ve found Jacob Rees Mogg making sense for possibly the first time ever.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1956379270445752482

 

[jack123]

How do you know that? They may well have been. Or they may have just thought they were bang to rights.

Because a few that have been convicted are serving 3-4 years in the clink, and someone who has said similar is serving no time. So yes, you have to think what advice they were given at the time.

Let’s face it, many people did or are still doing time, were there just one solicitor for them throughout the whole of England?

But along comes the solicitor for the Labour MP, plead not guilty, never meant it blah blah.

There are too many cases of people serving time, for similar online offences, yet a verbal rally of shouting slice people’s throats, is just never meant literally.

How can they not be poorly represented, and Ill informed legally, where another person has been caught hook line and sinker, with a very similar offence, yet walks away scot free,.

I will reiterate again, I have no problem with the chap from the article not going to prison, but come on this is ridiculous .

 

[JackSomething]

In a strange twist, I’ve found Jacob Rees Mogg making sense for possibly the first time ever.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1956379270445752482

Oh god, are we entering the era where Rees Mogg is one of the more sensible people?

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Oh god, are we entering the era where Rees Mogg is one of the more sensible people?

Wouldn’t that be quite a twist.

 

[jack123]

This chap gets my point across entirely, In just a few words.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1956439128465359010

Edit: only after clicking on his profile, I realised he has something to do with Reform, which I didn’t know, I don’t like them, but it’s still a good point though.

 

[JackSomething]

This chap gets my point across entirely, In just a few words.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1956439128465359010

Edit: only after clicking on his profile, I realised he has something to do with Reform, which I didn’t know, I don’t like them, but it’s still a good point though.

I'm honestly wondering if I'm missing something here. It's not 'a game where different tactical strategies lead to vastly different outcomes'. You literally have 2 choices when you're charged with a crime, plead guilty or plead not guilty.

If you decide not guilty then obviously your defence will include some kind of strategy and the more money you have to pay for legal representation, the better those strategies will be. It's been this way forever, why is it these two cases are causing people to lose their minds (other than the obvious political reasons that is)?