I was watching the game. Every time we put a cross in one of their massive defenders would head the ball away before any of our non-massive forwards got anywhere close. It was a futile exercise even if the quality of the balls had been better. That was my point. What was your point? That they should have/could have scored another three goals while we were pointlessly continuing to try to cross our way to victory? That would have been a valid response to my post if I had said anything about our defence. But I didn't. So I don't get your point. I know that another poster has said that you are not a Russian Bot/Troll from Penarth and that they've known you since you were knee high to a bombsite, but you sure as hell post like a WUM. With respect.