Trouble is you can't just sell a player unless we get a bid and then the player gets offered terms that suit him (and his agent).Why do we constantly seem to have a host of first team players in the last year of their contract? It always used to be typical that if a player had two years remaining, he either had to sign a new deal or be sold that summer. The club lose any sort of negotiating power once the player is down to 12 months.
Considering the owners are constantly telling us how much it costs "just to keep the lights on", you'd think they'd pay a bit more attention to preserving the values of the few playing assets they do have.
Naughton, Darling, Pedersen, Cabango, Allen and Cullen are out of contract next summer with Broome, Fisher, Parker, Key, Tymon, Tjoe-A-On, Abdulai, Fulton and Ginnelly the following summer.
That's 15 of the first team squad who have less than two years remaining on their contracts and should have either been extended or sold this summer. Instead, they could possibly walk away for nothing and the club then has no money to reinvest into the squad
Many of those will only be of interest to teams lower down the pyramid and why would they agree to lower wages when they can see out their contract and then get a signing on fee when they move.