• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

The ❌Kim Hellberg❌ Non-Managerial Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magic_Michu
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 980
  • Views Views: Views 61,568
That is definitely the case.

But I guarantee most know more about championship football than the vast, vast majority of Americans. Largely because we’ve actually watched it. Until a couple of seasons ago it wasn’t even available to watch in the US outside the odd game.
I agree it’s a huge gamble and we’ve definitely seen more Championship football than our owners, but I look at Maresca, Farke, Wagner. All had limited to absolutely no experience (although Farke had a few years in at a very low level in Germany). It’s not unprecedented in this league.

I would have gone for Thorup myself but I’m happy to give Matos a chance.
 
Smurph, if someone has managed 11 games of football, they are by definition an inexperienced manager. It doesn't really come down to perception.

I think we can all agree Sheehan was considered an inexperienced manager when we made him permanent in the summer and he'd managed almost double the amount of games Matos had over his two caretaker spells (20).
It’s genuinely pointless.

All of us will hope against hope he turns out to be brilliant.

But for some fans to be talking themselves into taking any position other than this is an enormous gamble is crazy.
 
Smurph, if someone has managed 11 games of football, they are by definition an inexperienced manager. It doesn't really come down to perception.

I think we can all agree Sheehan was considered an inexperienced manager when we made him permanent in the summer and he'd managed almost double the amount of games Matos had over his two caretaker spells (20).
I'm not disagreeing with that, I've even said I'm trying to look past his inexperience.

Any appointment is going to be a risk. The guys will have plenty of experience built up from working with some of the best players and coaching staff in the world.
 
I agree it’s a huge gamble and we’ve definitely seen more Championship football than our owners, but I look at Maresca, Farke, Wagner. All had limited to absolutely no experience (although Farke had a few years in at a very low level in Germany). It’s not unprecedented in this league.

I would have gone for Thorup myself but I’m happy to give Matos a chance.
Everyone is happy to do so.

That’s not the point I was making.
 
None of us will be.

But don’t pretend he is anything other than a ‘oh shit, our target has turned us down’ appointment.

It’s an enormous gamble and one that clearly is inconsistent with off field aspirations.
Same rules of the game apply and you already know and understand that.

If you're looking for an argument I suggest you try finding it with someone else.
 
I'm not disagreeing with that, I've even said I'm trying to look past his inexperience.

Any appointment is going to be a risk. The guys will have plenty of experience built up from working with some of the best players and coaching staff in the world.
That’s the problem though.

Working with some of the best players in the world isn’t the experience you necessarily need for managing in the championship.

I can see the thinking. Someone who is used to player development at a top level working with our young squad in trying to develop them. But developing young players at Liverpool to slot into a squad chock full of brilliance isn’t the same as developing a 23 year old Swedish midfielder to play alongside other players also needing development in the championship. One is developing individuals, the other is developing a whole squad.
 
Same rules of the game apply and you already know and understand that.

If you're looking for an argument I suggest you try finding it with someone else.
I wasn’t. You were the one who argued with the post I’d made not the other way round.
 
Everyone is happy to do so.

That’s not the point I was making.
Of course, I didn’t mean to suggest otherwise. I’m just going to give these owners the benefit of the doubt for now. Felt like they were obligated to appoint Sheehan, this is their first big test for me.
 
Of course, I didn’t mean to suggest otherwise. I’m just going to give these owners the benefit of the doubt for now. Felt like they were obligated to appoint Sheehan, this is their first big test for me.
Well they’ve quite obviously been backed into a corner as the first choice (who was a choice of Montague which is, in itself interesting) has turned us down.
 
Well they’ve quite obviously been backed into a corner as the first choice (who was a choice of Montague which is, in itself interesting) has turned us down.
Feels like they are going for a general style. By all accounts, Hellberg wanted to control the game and be hardworking off the ball. That’s the broad strokes of what Matos is about from what I’ve been reading. For me it’s encouraging that they know what they want in a manager. I totally get the concerns at the same time though.
 
I know nothing about the bloke so good luck to him. I know that no one cares what I think but I’m gonna tell you anyway - it’s a terrible, terrible idea and if it happens this board is going to make more of a mess of this than the last lot. This time next year we’ll be following Cardiff around due to their failure to get promoted.

UPPA Swans. ☹️
 

Bristol City v Swansea City

Back
Top