• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

Club statement: Loan converted to equity

Will the club or squad see any actual benefit of this 'investment'?

Or are they just putting into the clubs name that they'll get back if / when they sell?
 
Chief said:
Will the club or squad see any actual benefit of this 'investment'?

Or are they just putting into the clubs name that they'll get back if / when they sell?

It’s been done to avoid ‘more’ debt. 👀

https://www.swanseacity.com/news/club-statement-april-12
 
Chief said:
Will the club or squad see any actual benefit of this 'investment'?

Or are they just putting into the clubs name that they'll get back if / when they sell?

Next Level........ :roll:
 
Chief said:
Will the club or squad see any actual benefit of this 'investment'?

Or are they just putting into the clubs name that they'll get back if / when they sell?

It’s just diluting the shares of the minority shareholders, cleaning the books for the upcoming investment (sale).

Surely
 
And so the Trust shareholding reduces even more - now a total of 11.5% and the "non dilutable" 5% at 2.7%...

Value of Trust shareholding is £3.5m based on todays share price
 
PSumbler said:
And so the Trust shareholding reduces even more - now a total of 11.5% and the "non dilutable" 5% at 2.7%...

Value of Trust shareholding is £3.5m based on todays share price

Sorry if this is a dull question....

But the non dilutable 5% has been diluted!?
 
PSumbler said:
And so the Trust shareholding reduces even more - now a total of 11.5% and the "non dilutable" 5% at 2.7%...

Value of Trust shareholding is £3.5m based on todays share price
So are the non dilutable shares actually dilutable?
 
Chief said:
Sorry if this is a dull question....

But the non dilutable 5% has been diluted!?

The voting rights were essentially the only thing that were non dilutable.
 
Chief said:
Sorry if this is a dull question....

But the non dilutable 5% has been diluted!?

The Trust always claimed that the 5% could not be diluted but it can - it is 47500 shares out of a total shareholding (which now stands at more than 1.7m)

Its a 2.7% shareholding that carries 5% voting rights. Which is pretty much meaningless when 95% of the voting rights sit elsewhere.
 
Chief said:
Wow. So what percentage do the trust actually now own?

11.5% of which 2.7% are the Class A shares

Based on a £30m valuation of the club its about £3.5m
 
PSumbler said:
11.5% of which 2.7% are the Class A shares

Based on a £30m valuation of the club its about £3.5m

Which will be much less at the next dilution then and there will be another dilution that seems obvious, so from a strong position of owning 21% of the club, to what will no doubt end up being worthless, unbelievable. :x :x :x
 
Niigata Jack said:
Which will be much less at the next dilution then and there will be another dilution that seems obvious, so from a strong position of owning 21% of the club, to what will no doubt end up being worthless, unbelievable. :x :x :x

First name terms with club staff mind and welcome in the directors box whenever they want. Which is most games for some...
 
And given the money has been credited as this "investment will help fund ongoing running costs within the club and avoid more debt on the club’s balance sheet."

It tells you what a dreadful financial position the club must be in at the moment that we need seven figure cash injections...

I mean it couldnt be any other reason could it?
 
PSumbler said:
And given the money has been credited as this "investment will help fund ongoing running costs within the club and avoid more debt on the club’s balance sheet."

It tells you what a dreadful financial position the club must be in at the moment that we need seven figure cash injections...

I mean it couldnt be any other reason could it?

It could be a precursor to a sale.

Or at least in a few weeks, "we don't want to sell players but we had to put in £1m a few weeks ago and now need more."
 

Swansea City v Leeds United

Online statistics

Members online
16
Guests online
203
Total visitors
219

Forum statistics

Threads
19,167
Messages
266,829
Members
4,701
Back
Top