• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Extending the vote to 16-18 year olds

  • Thread starter Thread starter exiledclaseboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 48
  • Views Views: Views 3,933
Cos that’s what I’m saying. 😩. Another example of why 16 year olds should get a say.
 
I feel very strongly in favour of the age limit for voting to be lowered to 16 years of age.

If they are allowed to make a massively complex life or death decision, to enrol for the military at 16, which prepares them for deployment to the frontline at 18, where they can be killed, then why can’t they be trusted with the massively complex decision to vote which doesn’t include the chances of dying at such a young age?

They are deemed to know their own minds enough to do the former, so the latter should be a doddle by comparison.
 
I feel very strongly in favour of the age limit for voting to be lowered to 16 years of age.

If they are allowed to make a massively complex life or death decision, to enrol for the military at 16, which prepares them for deployment to the frontline at 18, where they can be killed, then why can’t they be trusted with the massively complex decision to vote which doesn’t include the chances of dying at such a young age?

They are deemed to know their own minds enough to do the former, so the latter should be a doddle by comparison.
Right but like most things at 16, thats with parental consent, this is common sense and necessary to protect children.

The thought of politicians going into comp schools and campaigning for votes is sickening
 
Those same teenagers going into military training at 16 in preparation for combat where they could be killed at age 18 is what I would call sickening.
 

Members online

Back
Top