Yes, I do Captain. Either it's a coincidence, or alternatively they've only managed two shots on target in 3 hours of play because something is wrong there. 2 - 0 isn't a "precise" prediction (single not plural) and I'll be happy with any winning score.
And are you the same Captain Sham who wrote this last week? "Ive predicted we will lose 3-2 twice before(Hull and For) and we havent lost yet."
PlasticAnother enforced absence for me. Two Saturday’s on the trot
Cullen at ten. Widell off the bench if Cullen isn’t working. Give Key a rest and play Galbraith at RB. Yalcouyé and Franco as two in the middle. Don’t care who starts out of Vip or Idah, swap them if it’s not flowing. Don’t be afraid of Leicester. Thank you please.
What can I say, maths is not my strongest subjectI'd be really impressed with Sheehan if he puts out a side with 10 men AND we still win 2-0...
How rude!Plastic
Tongue in cheek and I stopped as soon as we lost...I will let you in on a secret. I didnt actually think we would lose either game 3-2. I was just being silly.
FAir enough. There are more than two options as to why they only have 2 shots on target in 3 hrs of play though. You didnt factor in opponent or injury or luck or dodgy ref or striker leaving his shooting boots on the bus (they had 13 total shots vs WBA and 16 against Wrexham.The BBC stats are quite confusing. They even have a category for shots that hit the woodwork, which is technically not on target) or... there are any number of other reasons than coincidence or somethings wrong. And finally, whats to say our game isnt the game when all that changes anyway? I find predictions of any kind laughable.(See my previous post for details)
