This would be a Pedersen/Christie/Delcroix replacement, who hopefully would rarely play. Remember we made a loss of over £15 million last season despite making a profit on player sales of £4.5 million. We'll be struggling to break even as it is, so we will need a few free transfers and loanees to supplement the Inoussa type top dollar signings.
I get your points but not this player. Not a fair comparison
Christie(829 mins)/Pederson(0 mins) Premiere Lge players down grading a division through age
Christie covering all defence positions. RB, CH and LB which he did at Derby I think. Hence 829 mins
Delacroix(888 mins) getting experience to go up to Prem
Santos never been higher than league 1 and 30. An age where players are starting to down grade divisions.
We are not going to be giving him game time because he's part of a loan agreement where the parent club expects him to get minutes Like DeLacroix
We are not going to have him playing RB/LB where the majority of Christies minutes are
Should we need a player for 300 to 400 minutes a season(essentially 3 or 4 full games per season) then I would much rather throw an inexperienced Lissah in at the deep end when we do need minutes from a 3rd CH
On wages/fee point. Lissah is free and lower wage than Santos. Why put this player in the way of developing our U21's. If we put squad fillers like Santos in for 2 years when or how does Lissah progress. Same for other positions on the pitch re U21 players progressing.
So its not just being a back up. He would also be an obstacle for other players to develop.
Assuming Darling leaves I have no problem signing 2 quality or decent CH's even tho that would block Lissah