• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

The Rapist formerly known as Drakeford

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darran
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 54
  • Views Views: Views 5,237
Itchysphincter said:
I have answered, sorry you don’t understand.

Who’s Drugford? What’s the conflict of interests?

Typo sorry not Drugford, Dripford. :lol:
 
jack123 said:
I said fans guys website, you then said about a connection to do with a convicted rapist, which I never mentioned. And I can't understand why you said that? Maybe thinking I was going to say something wrong? Who knows.

I think you need to explain yourself. Now I can’t speak for anyone else, I’m not in to trying to whip up a mob….. but the have no idea what your point is?

I have asked in non-offensive manor. Please see above.
 
jack123 said:
I said fans guys website, you then said about a connection to do with a convicted rapist, which I never mentioned. And I can't understand why you said that? Maybe thinking I was going to say something wrong? Who knows.

I still don’t know what the connection is with “pride and lgbtq”.
 
Itchysphincter said:
:roll: * just to add to the above …..

You did ask me not to reply, but even if I did it would be the same answer. :lol:

Tell me you are silly, without telling me you are silly. Thank you itch, made my day dumbo :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
There's something akin to rubbernecking in watching someone engage in a battle of wits when they're unarmed.
 
jack123 said:
Tell me you are silly, without telling me you are silly. Thank you itch, made my day dumbo :lol: :lol: :lol:

Oh no, are you calling me names! :cry:

:lol:

What’s the conflict of interest re LGBTQ, Mark Drakeford and Pride? I’m not on the same page here?

BTW, I told you I didn’t want to do this earlier but you keep asking questions and making engaging posts. You could just stfu? :lol:
 
exiledclaseboy said:
I still don’t know what the connection is with “pride and lgbtq”.

i will say no more on the subject, i think it was pretty innocent in what I said, but I can already see the knives sharpening hoping I will say something wrong or offensive, which is not going to happen. Sometimes, You should not have to explain, exactly what you mean, nobody else has too, only me, innocent remarks get the fine tooth comb treatment.
 
jack123 said:
i will say no more on the subject, i think it was pretty innocent in what I said, but I can already see the knives sharpening hoping I will say something wrong or offensive, which is not going to happen. Sometimes, You should not have to explain, exactly what you mean, nobody else has too, only me, innocent remarks get the fine tooth comb treatment.

All I asked is what the conflict of interest is because I genuinely don’t understand the point you were making but if you can’t explain it that’s fine, I shall bother you no longer.
 
jack123 said:
i will say no more on the subject, i think it was pretty innocent in what I said, but I can already see the knives sharpening hoping I will say something wrong or offensive, which is not going to happen. Sometimes, You should not have to explain, exactly what you mean, nobody else has too, only me, innocent remarks get the fine tooth comb treatment.

Well no. See: the other thread. :lol: :lol:
 
exiledclaseboy said:
All I asked is what the conflict of interest is because I genuinely don’t understand the point you were making but if you can’t explain it that’s fine, I shall bother you no longer.

That's ok, and thank you, I'm in no position at the moment, to convey my feelings properly, I'm half cut if truth be told, so any serious subjects would certainly go down the toilet, if I replied and properly tried to interact, I have learned my lesson from the past, not when I made the post mind. But all of a sudden, oo christ I'm half cut, knock it on the head, nothing too serious, only comment on light hearted subjects.
 

Members online

Back
Top