Most visitors online was 2071 , on 25 Apr 24
Chief said:Risc said:Can’t expand at the mo I take it?
Players took Patersons side, mood in club terrible, lack of respect for Martin, person who sent the message (I don't know who it is) said it's worst atmosphere he's seen around the club.
Yesterday's second half performance doesn't tally up with that in my opinion mind you.
PSumbler said:Chief said:Martin and the official site have both officially confirmed the contracts been extended.
If they've done that early without consulting Paterson he has grounds to sue.
But yes as you say, that can be sorted in the background, he's still earning more than he would be at any other club that would have taken a punt on him in the summer, so he needs some perspective and knuckle down
I'm not saying they weren't discussing contracts - absolutely no doubt in my mind that there were extended discussions around it.
But discussions and getting a signature on a piece of paper are different things and maybe it was felt to be a done deal (verbally) and then maybe we signed a couple of players and a certain winger felt that it was wrong he was being paid less than either of them?
I don't know but the one thing I am reasonably certain on based on current events is that Paterson has not signed the contract. If he has and is moaning about wages then that suggests he is thicker than your average thick person. That's where my conclusion comes from.
ANd remember you spend many hours discussing with someone the knock on effect of our majority owners changing the goalposts after a verbal agreement over terms....
Your last paragraph is spot on though
Risc said:Another question Phil. Why are you sure it’s a club leak? Would the club use Stu James who is a public critic of The Americans and how the club is generally run.
I reckon it’s a pato leak.
AndyCole said:PSumbler said:I'm not saying they weren't discussing contracts - absolutely no doubt in my mind that there were extended discussions around it.
But discussions and getting a signature on a piece of paper are different things and maybe it was felt to be a done deal (verbally) and then maybe we signed a couple of players and a certain winger felt that it was wrong he was being paid less than either of them?
I don't know but the one thing I am reasonably certain on based on current events is that Paterson has not signed the contract. If he has and is moaning about wages then that suggests he is thicker than your average thick person. That's where my conclusion comes from.
ANd remember you spend many hours discussing with someone the knock on effect of our majority owners changing the goalposts after a verbal agreement over terms....
Your last paragraph is spot on though
Oh dear, this smacks of being out-of-the-loop-aboutery.
It was noted by many ydy how you chose to frown upon other news sources that shared the scoop that Pato would be absent. All on your matchday thread, poor form.
AndyCole said:PSumbler said:I'm not saying they weren't discussing contracts - absolutely no doubt in my mind that there were extended discussions around it.
But discussions and getting a signature on a piece of paper are different things and maybe it was felt to be a done deal (verbally) and then maybe we signed a couple of players and a certain winger felt that it was wrong he was being paid less than either of them?
I don't know but the one thing I am reasonably certain on based on current events is that Paterson has not signed the contract. If he has and is moaning about wages then that suggests he is thicker than your average thick person. That's where my conclusion comes from.
ANd remember you spend many hours discussing with someone the knock on effect of our majority owners changing the goalposts after a verbal agreement over terms....
Your last paragraph is spot on though
Oh dear, this smacks of being out-of-the-loop-aboutery.
It was noted by many ydy how you chose to frown upon other news sources that shared the scoop that Pato would be absent. All on your matchday thread, poor form.
AndyCole said:PSumbler said:I'm not saying they weren't discussing contracts - absolutely no doubt in my mind that there were extended discussions around it.
But discussions and getting a signature on a piece of paper are different things and maybe it was felt to be a done deal (verbally) and then maybe we signed a couple of players and a certain winger felt that it was wrong he was being paid less than either of them?
I don't know but the one thing I am reasonably certain on based on current events is that Paterson has not signed the contract. If he has and is moaning about wages then that suggests he is thicker than your average thick person. That's where my conclusion comes from.
ANd remember you spend many hours discussing with someone the knock on effect of our majority owners changing the goalposts after a verbal agreement over terms....
Your last paragraph is spot on though
Oh dear, this smacks of being out-of-the-loop-aboutery.
It was noted by many ydy how you chose to frown upon other news sources that shared the scoop that Pato would be absent. All on your matchday thread, poor form.
PSumbler said:AndyCole said:Oh dear, this smacks of being out-of-the-loop-aboutery.
It was noted by many ydy how you chose to frown upon other news sources that shared the scoop that Pato would be absent. All on your matchday thread, poor form.
No idea what you are talking about here but I am sure it makes sense to you - not frowned on anything to my knowledge but you go ahead with whatever you are on about
Risc said:Another question Phil. Why are you sure it’s a club leak? Would the club use Stu James who is a public critic of The Americans and how the club is generally run.
I reckon it’s a pato leak.
PSumbler said:AndyCole said:Oh dear, this smacks of being out-of-the-loop-aboutery.
It was noted by many ydy how you chose to frown upon other news sources that shared the scoop that Pato would be absent. All on your matchday thread, poor form.
No idea what you are talking about here but I am sure it makes sense to you - not frowned on anything to my knowledge but you go ahead with whatever you are on about
Risc said:PSumbler said:No idea what you are talking about here but I am sure it makes sense to you - not frowned on anything to my knowledge but you go ahead with whatever you are on about
Phil please do us all a favour and just ban him.
Swanjaxs said:AndyCole said:Oh dear, this smacks of being out-of-the-loop-aboutery.
It was noted by many ydy how you chose to frown upon other news sources that shared the scoop that Pato would be absent. All on your matchday thread, poor form.
Give it a rest you fùckin asswipe, your lucky your "opinion" is still tolerated on Phils site, the owner of some other site can't take any sort of criticism, just throws the dummy out.
Wind, your, stupid, neck, in, you, stupid, oaf,,,,,,,
.
.