• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

22/23 The Rotherham v Swansea Official Match Thread

What will the result be against Rotherham?

  • Rotherham win

    Votes: 5 16.1%
  • Draw

    Votes: 11 35.5%
  • Swans win

    Votes: 15 48.4%

  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .
Hmm nope Ntcham for Paterson and Manning for Sorinola.
Still no Congreve.
 
Looks like RM is trying to make that point too.
They have had a solid 3-4 mins rest with this and the subs earlier when the keeper went down.
 
Ntcham is looking up for it showing a lot of quality already.
 
Swanjaxs said:
Pegojack said:
Yep, constant buffering.

Pony up 170 quid then if you want perfection :lol:

I am on a 200mbps connection, the site serving it is using a fucking toaster.
Won't use those kodi things - very dangerous for your security.
 
Ref totally allowed them to kill the tempo of the game with their "injuries"
 
Dont get people complaining about dodgy sites buffering, a simple 50 quid ish will get you every game and virtually every sports channel in the English speaking world and ppv's etc, this afternoon my iptv provider has given me a choice of comms and the picture quality stunning, honestly people the cost of a pint a month....
 
Ebo said:
Swanjaxs said:
Pony up 170 quid then if you want perfection :lol:

I am on a 200mbps connection, the site serving it is using a f*****g toaster.
Won't use those kodi things - very dangerous for your security.

Fair, but you could be on 600mb but won't make a difference if the stream is unreliable, always will be hit or miss...
 

Middlesbrough v Swansea City

Online statistics

Members online
18
Guests online
600
Total visitors
618

Forum statistics

Threads
24,046
Messages
325,871
Members
4,815
Back
Top