• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Season 23/24 | WBA v The Swans | The Official Match Thread | EFL Championship | The Hawthorns

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackharris
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 256
  • Views Views: Views 35,374

What will the result be against West Brom

  • West Brom win

    Votes: 5 18.5%
  • Draw

    Votes: 13 48.1%
  • Swans win

    Votes: 9 33.3%

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .
Swanjaxs said:
Cabango, Wood and Darling just ain't working, weak in the air, slow and can't use the ball...

It didn't last season so don't see why it should be any different this time
 
It doesn’t help that Piroe is the only one looking for the ball coming back. Fulton is hiding and Grimes just gives it straight back to CBs putting more pressure on them.

Watching Cabango trying to ping a 50 diagonal is like scratching nails down a chalkboard.
 
Swanjaxs said:
Cabango, Wood and Darling just ain't working, weak in the air, slow and can't use the ball...

They are back 4 defenders. Then they are fine. They need to be in a FUCKING back 4.
 
This is a frigging shambles!
Our shape is terrible, hoping it's just early season rustiness.

We are getting hurt down our left hand side.

2nd half I would be looking to bring Mylko for Cooper and put Piroe in deeper with Yates and Mylko up top.
If we are going to hoof it then we may aswell have a target to play off.
 
phact0rri said:
When Wyndam sounds grim we might have a problem...

Indeed, wonder when he's pencilled in to commentate...

(It's Curt commentating today but I'm sure you knew that ;) )
 
monmouth said:
They are back 4 defenders. Then they are fine. They need to be in a f*****g back 4.

Going to a back 4 then allows us to put a bit of width so we can have some kind of outlet.
Hoping he does as Martin did and go to a back 4.
 
monmouth said:
They are back 4 defenders. Then they are fine. They need to be in a f*****g back 4.
That's what I meant about wrong shape rather than no shape. This is exactly what was happening last week against Brum when they were penning our back 3 in, we need an extra body in midfield and the best way to achieve that is to go to a back 4.
 
Hmm, very much aimless long balls at the moment.

There's a difference between wanting more direct football and not wanting the back 4 knock it between each other for 10 f*cking minutes, by the way.
 

Swansea City 🦢v Nottingham Forest 🌳

Back
Top