• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Season 20/21: The Huddersfield v Swansea City Match Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter JA News
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 361
  • Views Views: Views 71,388

What will the result be against Huddersfield?

  • Huddersfield win

    Votes: 3 9.4%
  • Draw

    Votes: 6 18.8%
  • Swans win

    Votes: 23 71.9%

  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .
BLAZE said:
MrSwerve said:
Didn’t he stop the ‘fisting’ thing like 10-15 games into his first season?

He seems fairly level-headed to me. Praises the team when we win and deflects the pressure when we lose.

Don't try and talk sense into him, this loss has been a long time coming for him

He is a fking clown.
 
I quite like Cov City been impressed with their style, my outside tip, was hoping for a good show this weekend, gonna be tough for us
 
Glyn1 said:
We've lost one game in eleven. All of us would have sold our souls for that 2 months ago.

Mate, in isolation you are perfectly correct... whilst looking at our recent history you are papering over the cracks.

Don't get me wrong, Coops is improving as we go along BUT recently his thinking has proved to be awry.
 
MrSwerve said:
Didn’t he stop the ‘fisting’ thing like 10-15 games into his first season?

We were basically rubbish for most of the season after his first 10-15 games so his fisting opportunities were limited. There's been no bugger in there to fist since before we turned things around.
 
I swore I wasn't going to get excited and start believing. The moment I did we got gubbed. Lesson learned. My ambitions are back to hoping we can be competitive in the next game.
 
did not change the system quick enough. we need to play different systems against other teams istead of sticking to 352 all the time. teams have got wise to us and set up against us.
 
Dr. Winston said:
MrSwerve said:
Didn’t he stop the ‘fisting’ thing like 10-15 games into his first season?

We were basically rubbish for most of the season after his first 10-15 games so his fisting opportunities were limited. There's been no bugger in there to fist since before we turned things around.

Now there’s a post I never imagined you writing, Doc. :lol:
 
Captain_Sham said:
I swore I wasn't going to get excited and start believing. The moment I did we got gubbed. Lesson learned. My ambitions are back to hoping we can be competitive in the next game.

Snap. I wasn’t prepared for that yesterday. Schoolboy error.
 
I bet the Udders couldn't believe their luck an hour before KO yesterday.

"Bah 'eck lads, it's t' same team that we watched on t' video in t' week. You know, t' woon where they were raaaaght crap in"".

I need to move on...
 
The simple fact for me is that we look weaker every time we put Naughton in the back three. I think I said at some point yesterday we should play Bennett, Guehi and Cabango as our starting back 3 and not rotate it unless we have an injury. These players should be able to come through two games in a week without needing constant rest.

We miss Smith in the middle which suggests we have to play 3 of these 5 - Smith, Fulton, Grimes, Hourihane and Dhanda.
 
PSumbler said:
The simple fact for me is that we look weaker every time we put Naughton in the back three. I think I said at some point yesterday we should play Bennett, Guehi and Cabango as our starting back 3 and not rotate it unless we have an injury. These players should be able to come through two games in a week without needing constant rest.

We miss Smith in the middle which suggests we have to play 3 of these 5 - Smith, Fulton, Grimes, Hourihane and Dhanda.

I don’t think maybe Bennett can do two games a week, with his muscle niggles (they can take many weeks of no work to settle if you keep trying to stress them as I know to my own cost) but I would have Lati before Naughton in the three and Naughts at full back and emergency back three or even as defensive mid. Not as a first choice any more.
 
PSumbler said:
The simple fact for me is that we look weaker every time we put Naughton in the back three. I think I said at some point yesterday we should play Bennett, Guehi and Cabango as our starting back 3 and not rotate it unless we have an injury. These players should be able to come through two games in a week without needing constant rest.

We miss Smith in the middle which suggests we have to play 3 of these 5 - Smith, Fulton, Grimes, Hourihane and Dhanda.
I agree Phil - I like Kylie as a player, and especially venturing forward. Always a mistake in him in defence I feel.

The defence is a unit, more about organisation than anywhere else on the pitch. Subbing Bennett at HT was risky no matter how off the pace he was - 15 mins at HT is not enough to go through exactly who does what and when IMHO. Hindsight and all that!
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top