• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Vaccine Invation

  • Thread starter Thread starter jack123
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 477
  • Views Views: Views 88,306
jack123 said:
MajorR said:
Not wishing to disrespect of the people who’ve lost their lives or their families, but a mortality rate of 7 out of 18 million is very low and far lower than the number who would have died through covid. A lot of the people who were prioritised for the vaccine were the older generation and those with health condition who were potentially at much high risk of dying. The vaccine seems to be a much safer option.

Of course, it's a delicate subject, from people who have lost loved ones, to the ones who have not been anywhere due to shielding, I really feel for you.

But I don't believe a word the BBC says.

But you believe some twàt on Twitter saying that 337 deaths for every 100k vaccinated :lol: :lol:
 
jack123 said:
MajorR said:
Not wishing to disrespect of the people who’ve lost their lives or their families, but a mortality rate of 7 out of 18 million is very low and far lower than the number who would have died through covid. A lot of the people who were prioritised for the vaccine were the older generation and those with health condition who were potentially at much high risk of dying. The vaccine seems to be a much safer option.

Of course, it's a delicate subject, from people who have lost loved ones, to the ones who have not been anywhere due to shielding, I really feel for you.

But I don't believe a word the BBC says.

Then read it on one of the other sites like Sky.

You won’t believe the BBC which is a world renowned and respected broadcaster and but you’ll refer to somebody on twitter. For what it’s worth, you can find similar articles in the various other media sources. Why not do a bit of background reading before posting guff on line?
 
Itchysphincter said:
jack123 said:
No one is being coerced! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Don't be so silly, it's blatant full on coercion, take the vax or you won't be allowed in pubs or other venues.

That’s not coercion, unless you’re compelled to enter pubs for some reason? 😁

Of course it is.

I'm not talking about myself, I'm not compelled to enter pubs but I wouldn't mind..

Toxic masculinity?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cc26Q3CW95Q
 
MajorR said:
jack123 said:
Of course, it's a delicate subject, from people who have lost loved ones, to the ones who have not been anywhere due to shielding, I really feel for you.

But I don't believe a word the BBC says.

Then read it on one of the other sites like Sky.

You won’t believe the BBC which is a world renowned and respected broadcaster and but you’ll refer to somebody on twitter. For what it’s worth, you can find similar articles in the various other media sources. Why not do a bit of background reading before posting guff on line?

What guff have I posted? Are you saying unless it's on bbc or sky any media outlet is not credible?
 
Swanjaxs said:
jack123 said:
Of course, it's a delicate subject, from people who have lost loved ones, to the ones who have not been anywhere due to shielding, I really feel for you.

But I don't believe a word the BBC says.

But you believe some twàt on Twitter saying that 337 deaths for every 100k vaccinated :lol: :lol:

Too right, and if I manage to get a link to what I saw, I will post the link, it was not someone saying that figure without a link to the article.
 
jack123 said:
Swanjaxs said:
But you believe some twàt on Twitter saying that 337 deaths for every 100k vaccinated :lol: :lol:

Too right, and if I manage to get a link to what I saw, I will post the link, it was not someone saying that figure without a link to the article.

I wouldn't bother mate, it's a total load of bolloxs and by posting it on here would only make you look even more foolish.
 
jack123 said:
MajorR said:
Then read it on one of the other sites like Sky.

You won’t believe the BBC which is a world renowned and respected broadcaster and but you’ll refer to somebody on twitter. For what it’s worth, you can find similar articles in the various other media sources. Why not do a bit of background reading before posting guff on line?

What guff have I posted? Are you saying unless it's on bbc or sky any media outlet is not credible?

F*cking moron.
 
Swanjaxs said:
jack123 said:
Too right, and if I manage to get a link to what I saw, I will post the link, it was not someone saying that figure without a link to the article.

I wouldn't bother mate, it's a total load of bolloxs and by posting it on here would only make you look even more foolish.


Well if by posting credible evidence will make me look foolish, then so be it!

You can carry on believing the bbc and sky bullshit, I choose not too. I hope that helps you in your decision making before discounting another's opinion as foolish.
 
jack123 said:
Swanjaxs said:
I wouldn't bother mate, it's a total load of bolloxs and by posting it on here would only make you look even more foolish.


Well if by posting credible evidence will make me look foolish, then so be it!

You can carry on believing the bbc and sky bullshit, I choose not too. I hope that helps you in your decision making before discounting another's opinion as foolish.

Oh go on then, post the tweet...
You never know, I might change my opinion on you 👍
 
Swanjaxs said:
jack123 said:
Well if by posting credible evidence will make me look foolish, then so be it!

You can carry on believing the bbc and sky bullshit, I choose not too. I hope that helps you in your decision making before discounting another's opinion as foolish.

Oh go on then, post the tweet...
You never know, I might change my opinion on you 👍

If i can find it, I will. And BTW I care little for your opinion of me, or anyone else for that matter, and I doubt it very much if you care of mine to you.
 
jack123 said:
Swanjaxs said:
Oh go on then, post the tweet...
You never know, I might change my opinion on you 👍

If i can find it, I will. And BTW I care little for your opinion of me, or anyone else for that matter, and I doubt it very much if you care of mine to you.

Fair enough 👌
Yea go find that tweet then, some may say you've made that ridiculous figure up just to try and justify you argument otherwise 🤔
 
Swanjaxs said:
jack123 said:
If i can find it, I will. And BTW I care little for your opinion of me, or anyone else for that matter, and I doubt it very much if you care of mine to you.

Fair enough 👌
Yea go find that tweet then, some may say you've made that ridiculous figure up just to try and justify you argument otherwise 🤔

If i can, I will, I saw the tweet I have not made it up, if I was to lie, I would have gone a bit higher than 377 per 100k
 
:lol:
jack123 said:
Swanjaxs said:
Fair enough 👌
Yea go find that tweet then, some may say you've made that ridiculous figure up just to try and justify you argument otherwise 🤔

If i can, I will, I saw the tweet I have not made it up, if I was to lie, I would have gone a bit higher than 377 per 100k

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Back
Top